There’s been plenty of coverage of pork spending in the last few days of the year. President Bush has criticized the omnibus appropriations bill because it contains money for a prison museum and a Portuguese-as-a-second-language program, among hundreds of other programs considered wasteful.
Rep. John Kline, in Minnesota’s 2nd District, has gotten religion on the issue this year, promising not to pursue any “earmarks” — pork — in this budget cycle.
Among the listings for Minnesota in labor and human services appropriations, according to Earmarkwatch.org:
A news release from Sen. Norm Coleman lists several projects:
Earmarkwatch.org uses a Google map to chart some of the defense-related projects. There are two in the Twin Cities area. A Hudson firm gets $2 million for self-sealing plastic enclosures for batteries. Phygen, in Minneapolis, gets $3 million for “high endurance coatings.”
At Fedspending.org, Minnesota is ranked 26th, with $3.9 billion in federal contracts. Alliant Tech Systems is the #1 recipient.
So here’s the question: Which of these is pork? Is there good pork? If so, how should a system of doling out the dough be changed to preserve it while weeding out the bridges to nowhere?
Rep. Tim Walz and Rep. Keith Ellison addressed these questions on MPR’s Midday today (best part is about 37 minutes in).